Consider the

:searching problem

Input: A sequence of \(n\) numbers \(A = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_n \rangle\) and a value \(v\).

Output: An index \(i\) such that \(v = A[i]\) or the special value \(\text {NIL}\) if \(v\) does not appear in \(A\).Write pseudocode for

, which scans through the sequence, looking for \(v\). Using a loop invariant, prove that your algorithm is correct. Make sure that your loop invariant fulfills the three necessary properties.linear search

For *linear search*, we just need to scan the array from the beginning till the end, index \(1\) to index \(n\), and check if the entry at that position equal to \(v\) or not. The pseudocode can be written as follows…

#### Loop Invariant

At the start of the each iteration of the

forloop of lines 1-3, the subarray \(A[1 .. i − 1]\) does not contain the value \(v\).

And here is how the three necessary properties hold for the loop invariant:

**Initialization:** Initially the subarray is empty. So, none of its’ elements are equal to \(v\).

**Maintenance:** In \(i\)-th iteration, we check whether \(A[i]\) is equal to \(v\) or not. If yes, we terminate the loop or we continue the iteration. So, if the subarray \(A[1..i - 1]\) did not contain \(v\) before the \(i\)-th iteration, the subarray \(A[1..i]\) will not contain \(v\) before the next iteration (unless \(i\)-th iteration terminates the loop).

**Termination:** The loop terminates in either of the following cases,

- We have reached index \(i\) such that \(v\) = \(A[i]\), or
- We reached the end of the array, i.e. we did not find \(v\) in the array \(A\). So, we return \(\text {NIL}\).

In either case, our algorithm does exactly what was required, which means the algorithm is correct.